THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL TEMPLATE - Unifr

the case of research involving the study of wildlife in the field or in the laboratory, for the provision in the phs assurance for institutional commitment (section ii) that requires the organization to establish and maintain a program for activities involving animals in accordance with the guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (guide), the organization has established and will maintain a program for activities involving animals according to the guide. you may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. since transcription is a tedious process, only use this option if you need to. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal).-barreled question: do you agree that campus parking is a problem and that the administration should be working diligently on a solution? these resources are not auditable by nsf and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. must upload a personal statement that describes your academic interest in and understanding of your chosen programme(s), as well as your purpose and objectives in undertaking this graduate study. if external review is to be obtained, then the pi will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. the box for "disclosure of lobbying activities" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet only if, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the certification, submission of the sf lll is required. proposal budget may request funds for the costs of documenting, preparing, publishing or otherwise making available to others the findings and products of the work conducted under the grant. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the irb approval letter to the cognizant program. note: see paragraph (a) above for guidance on acquisition of computing devices. the study proposal is supplemented by recruitment materials, consent forms, and data collection instruments. the information provided in this handout will help you to get started. travel support for dependents of key project personnel may be requested only when the travel is for a duration of six months or more either by inclusion in the approved budget or with the prior written approval of the cognizant nsf grants and agreements officer.. graduate student (research assistant) -- a part-time or full-time student working on the project in a research capacity who holds at least a bachelors degree and is enrolled in a degree program leading to an advanced degree. participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. the budget justification must be no more than three pages per proposal. proposers also may designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal, indicating why. documents for patterns, noting number of occurrences or other factors. should read and follow the guidance which is given throughout the online application. it must include clear statements as to why this project is appropriate for eager funding, including why it does not fit into existing programs and why it is a good fit for eager. if anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by nsf in the award notice budget. nsf prior approval is necessary if the objectives or scope of the project changes. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. an international activity is defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in cooperation with foreign counterparts either overseas or in the us using virtual technologies., the foundation does expect that the resources identified in the facilities, equipment, and other resources section will be provided, or made available, should the proposal be funded. amounts and expenses budgeted also must be consistent with the proposing organization's policies and procedures and cost accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting costs. this will facilitate determining whether the proposed work is appropriate for rapid funding. consent/authorization document is the only record linking the subject with the research.[ ] project summary:[ ] the project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. list, in reverse chronological order, of all the individual's academic/professional appointments beginning with the current appointment. all projects involving human subjects must either (1) have approval from the organization's institutional review board (irb) before issuance of an nsf award or, (2) must affirm that the irb has declared the research exempt from irb review, in accordance with the applicable subsection, as established in section 101(b) of the common rule. list of the individuals undergraduate and graduate education and postdoctoral training (including location) as indicated below:Undergraduate institution(s). for purposes of meeting the mentoring requirement, simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals, and collaborative proposals that include subawards, constitute a single unified project. proposers are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate nsf program to discuss the availability of funding and the appropriate funding mechanisms in advance of proposal submission. for the most computationally intensive projects, the blue waters system at university of illinois, urbana/champaign, is the most suitable. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; rapid proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg..3 for additional information on the administration of awards that utilize vertebrate animals. if irb approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate "pending" in the space provided for the approval date. closing a study requires pis to submit a closure report. for access and sharing including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements;. adherence to type size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller type or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal. proposals must include an authorization to deviate from standard nsf proposal preparation instructions in one of the following ways, as appropriate: (a) by identifying the solicitation number that authorized the deviation in the appropriate block on the cover sheet; or (b) for individual deviations, by identifying the name, date and title of the nsf official authorizing the deviation. describes criteria and procedures for the allowability of cash and in-kind contributions in satisfying cost sharing and matching requirements. questions are a type of biased question and lead your participants to agree or respond in a certain way. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. while not required by nsf, proposing organizations may, at their own discretion, continue to contribute voluntary uncommitted cost sharing to nsf-sponsored projects. office of research support and compliance & compliance notifies pis 90, 60, and 30 days prior to the study expiration date. instructions for completion of this process are available in fastlane. regarding conflict of interest: the aor is required to complete certifications stating that the organization has implemented and is enforcing a written policy on conflicts of interest (coi), consistent with the provisions of aag chapter iv. for additional guidance on mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals. if you are unable to upload your documents you may send them via post to:Graduate admissions office. if requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. signing the proposal certification pages, aors for prospective grantees located in fema-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations:(1) for nsf grants for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the dollar amount of the grant; and. any of the following items on the proposal cover sheet apply to a proposal, the applicable box(es) must be checked. of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. however, failure of the prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

Supporting documents - Supporting documents - How to apply

this guide is designed to provide you with an overview of primary research that is often done in writing classes. note that some nsf program solicitations modify the general provisions of the gpg, and in such cases, the guidelines provided in the solicitation must be followed.(vii) total direct costs (line h on the proposal budget). you should let your subjects know whether your research results will be anonymous or not. certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. is impossible to make sweeping generalizations about groups of people based solely on a few interviews, observations, or surveys. the proposer, therefore, shall obtain the nsf nondiscrimination certification from each organization that applies to be, or serves as a subrecipient or contractor under the award (for other than the provision of commercially available supplies, materials, equipment or general support services) prior to entering into the subaward or contract arrangement. may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and institutional affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. these strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. section applies to all research, for which nsf grant funds may be used, that potentially falls within the scope of the us government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern as published in september, 2014, hereafter referred to as the "policy". help defray the costs of participating in a conference or training activity, funds may be proposed for payment of stipends, per diem or subsistence allowances, based on the type and duration of the activity. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. notification of determinations reached at the full board meetings are e-mailed to pis within two weeks after the meeting date.. this word count is indicative, please refer to individual departmental webpages for a definitive limit. a wide array of information exists to help inform development of an institutions rcr training plan.(2) requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a federal, state, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;. this special information and supplementary documentation section also is not considered an appendix. all panelists are barred from receiving any research funding through, or in any other way collaborating on, the particular ideas lab in which they are involved. information given to potential subjects or their representatives must be in a language that is understandable to the subject or representative.) - for each proposal that describes an international activity, proposers should list the primary countries involved. these exploratory proposals also may be submitted directly to an nsf program, but the eager mechanism should not be used for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" (i.(2) building (and any related equipment) is covered by adequate flood insurance. pis are strongly encouraged to contact the cognizant nsf program officer prior to submission of a collaborative proposal. items, however, such as standard wheel chairs, prosthetics, hearing aids, tdd/text-phones, or general readers for the blind would not be supported because the need for them is not specific to the proposed project. good interview and survey questionsif you are conducting primary research using surveys or interviews, one of the most important things to focus on is creating good questions. funding of rapid awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. funding decisions will be made on the basis of the justification and availability of program funds with any resultant funding provided through a formal amendment of the existing nsf grant.[ ] if there are no facilities, equipment or other resources identified, a statement to that effect has been included in this section of the proposal and uploaded into fastlane. in either case, the lead organizations proposal must contain all of the requisite sections as a single package to be provided to reviewers (that will happen automatically when procedures below are followed). the knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. only publications are included, the heading "publications" may be used for this section of the biographical sketch. printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. be sure your own personal biases and opinions do not get in the way of your research and that you give both sides fair consideration. if we request additional documents you may send them using our online form. project description should provide a clear statement of the work to be undertaken and must include the objectives for the period of the proposed work and expected significance; the relationship of this work to the present state of knowledge in the field, as well as to work in progress by the pi under other support. each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should be individually paginated prior to being uploaded to the electronic system. application guide may use different naming conventions, and sections may appear in a different order than in fastlane, however, the content is the same:D. review submissions must include all current irb approved study documents, even if they have not changed since the last review:Continuing review application. an ideas lab may be run independently, or in parallel, with the issuance of an nsf funding opportunity on the same topic. use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. these categories include persons working on the project in a non-research capacity, such as secretaries, clerk-typists, draftsmen, animal caretakers, electricians and custodial personnel regardless of whether they hold a degree or are involved in degree work. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant program. you should ensure before applying that your area of research can be supervised in your chosen department. please list the title and credit value of each in-progress course that you are currently studying on the application. the informed consent and other documents are not professionally translated to the non-english language version, the following procedures must be performed when submitting non-english versions for the informed consent for irb approval:Create an original informed consent document in english (english version).(f) taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted--. the number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget. normally, title is vested in the grantee organization for equipment purchased in conjunction with nsf-supported activities. the award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. the project now being submitted has been funded previously by a source other than nsf, the information requested in the paragraph above must be furnished for the last period of funding. please note that some program solicitations provide specific guidance on preparation and inclusion of management plans in proposals submitted to nsf. irb proposal or other documents impacted by the proposed research modification. items of needed equipment must be adequately justified, listed individually by description and estimated cost. terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the definitions and coverage sections of the rules implementing executive order 12549. please note: the university of texas at austin institutional review board discourages the payment of finder’s fees (monetary or in kind) in any form, due to the potential that such a practice could be perceived as coercive and bordering on unethical research subject recruitment. this should normally be a reference from your most recent employer (see our guidance for professional references). the mere presence of an observer may alter the events--and if you interact with participants, you further risk changing what takes place. if we are unable to verify independently the accuracy of information supplied, your application may be cancelled and any offer or subsequent registration withdrawn. of this website is subject to, and implies acceptance of, its terms of use (including copyright and intellectual property, privacy and data protection and accessibility).

GPG Chapter II. Proposal Preparation Instructions

statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled. in such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. you may choose to supply these documents by post, in which case we will upload them to your application on your behalf. pis are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable. proposal budget may request costs for professional and consultant services. in such a case, nsf may add conditions to the award that prevent any research involving human subjects from being carried out, and otherwise restrict the drawing down of funds, until irb approval has been obtained. the irb is composed mainly of ut faculty and meets monthly to review research proposals.(3) any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and. it is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared.(ii) during the full proposal submission stage, the proposing organization should identify in the block entitled, "show related preliminary proposal number", the related preliminary proposal number assigned by nsf. pi(s) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic before submitting a rapid proposal. postdoctoral associates and other professionals, the total number of persons for each position must be listed, with the number of full-time-equivalent person-months and total amount of salaries requested per year. regarding federal tax obligations: when the proposal exceeds ,000,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding federal tax obligations.. undergraduate student -- a student who is enrolled in a degree program (part-time or full-time) leading to a bachelors or associates degree. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant nsf program officer before an award can be issued. see the "creating good survey and interview questions" section for tips on how to make your questions non-biased. proposals submitted for this purpose should address the same items as those indicated for conferences (see section 9 above), with particular attention to plans for composition and recruitment of the travel group. inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any compensation and an explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so, what they consist of, or where further information may be obtained;. the purpose of nsfs implementation of the policy is to clarify proposer expectations about nsf-funded research with certain high-consequence pathogens and toxins with potential to be considered dual use research of concern. the award size, however, will be consistent with the project scope and of a size comparable to grants in similar areas. proposal budget justification should indicate the general types of expendable materials and supplies required. by signing the certification pages, the aor certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, the proposing organization:(1) has filed all federal tax returns required during the three years preceding this certification;. should also indicate if you have discussed your proposed research with any member of the lse academic staff and the name of that person., the salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally be treated as indirect (f&a) costs. given that such separately submitted proposals constitute a "single" proposal submission to nsf, it is imperative that the proposals be submitted within a reasonable timeframe to one another. this certification sets forth the nondiscrimination obligations with which all awardees must comply.(b) establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about --. are advised that fastlane does not automatically paginate a proposal. "ideas lab" is a funding mechanism designed to support the development and implementation of creative and innovative project ideas that have the potential to transform research paradigms and/or solve intractable problems. the proposer therefore, shall obtain the nsf nondiscrimination certification from each organization that applies to be, or serves as a subrecipient, subgrantee or subcontractor under the award (for other than the provision of commercially available supplies, materials, equipment or general support services) prior to entering into the subaward arrangement. the gre/gmat is often a vital deciding factor so you will not be able to submit your application without it if your programme requires it. considerations in primary researchprimary research is conducted all of the time--journalists use it as their primary means of reporting news and events; national polls and surveys discover what the population thinks about a particular political figure or proposal; and companies collect data on their consumer base and market trends. sure that you proof read your proposal before you upload it, and make sure that you upload the final corrected version. may bring forward to the advisory committee, irb chair, director of rsc, or human subject’s program coordinator concerns or recommendations regarding the human research protection program, including the irb review process. the initial review of a research protocol, the irb is required to review both the amount of compensation proposed and the method and timing of disbursement to assure that neither are coercive or present undue influence. results related to intellectual merit and broader impacts are described under two separate, distinct headings.(i) salaries and wages (lines a and b on the proposal budget). at the nsf program officers discretion (subject to division director concurrence), they may invite none, some, or all of the project ideas as full proposals, with the final funding decision to occur after the full proposals have been received and reviewed. the location of the nearest aphis regional office, as well as information concerning this and other aphis activities, may be obtained at http://www. petaflop peak speed, but one that is designed to meet the needs of the atmospheric and related-sciences communities. the exception of the disclosure of lobbying activities (sf lll) identified below, the procedures for submission of the proposal certifications differ from those used with other single-copy documents. an example is: did you feel that the new campus regulation about parking was fair? currently, the allocation process for that resource is done directly via proposal submission to the cognizant program officer in the division of advanced cyberinfrastructure within the nsf directorate for computer & information science & engineering.: surveys are a form of questioning that is more rigid than interviews and that involve larger groups of people. the pi should consult his/her organizations sponsored projects office for unusual situations (e. if you have questions about the rules and procedures for ethical review or the applicability of this information to your proposal, first contact your drc.(vi)(e) for additional instructions on preparation of this type of proposal. an international activity is defined as research, training, and/or education carried out in cooperation with foreign counterparts either overseas or in the us using virtual technologies. personal statement is an important part of your application as selectors are looking for evidence of your motivation and suitability, and what you can bring to the programme. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal; also see gpg ii. in the specific case of computing devices, charging as a direct cost is allowable for devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of the nsf award.. the following provides a listing of the types of costs that may be included on a conference budget. in implementation of the boards recommendation, nsfs guidance23 is as follows:Voluntary committed and uncommitted cost sharing. your application is successful, we will request original or certified signed documents prior to registration. disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that might be advantageous to the subject;. the proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. you are sending your documents by courier service, omit po box 13420 from the above address. in a location designated, or eligible to be designated, a registered historic place.

What is Primary Research and How do I get Started?

a current listing of licensed animal dealers also may be obtained from aphis. there is no fixed word limit, but we expect this to be no longer than 1,000 - 1,500 words. participants may answer one but not both, or may disagree with part or all of the question. the letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities, explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the nsf proposal, and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. your faculty sponsor must approve your application prior to irb submission. such potentially disqualifying connections include:A reviewers recent former employer;. the research proposal describes the protocol you will follow beginning with the purpose of the study, research questions, background, significance,  design, proposed statistical analyses, research methods, and human subject interactions. this limit includes salary compensation received from all nsf-funded grants. categories of information that are submitted in conjunction with a proposal are for "nsf use only. while not required by nsf, awardee organizations may, at their own discretion, continue to contribute voluntary uncommitted cost sharing to nsf-sponsored projects. you are working on a local problem that may not have been addressed before and little research is there to back it up. on this page | freedom of information | about this site | social media. gre or gmat scores are required by your chosen programme(s) it is essential that you supply them at the time you apply.. in addition to other provisions required by the proposing organization, all contracts made under the nsf award must contain the applicable provisions identified in 2 cfr 200 appendix ii. salaries requested must be consistent with the organizations regular practices. where specifically identified in an nsf program solicitation, the applicable us federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) must be used in computing indirect costs (f&a) for a proposal.) and all regulations and policies issued by nsf pursuant to these statutes. in cases where the pi or co-pi has received more than one award (excluding amendments to existing awards), they need only report on the one award most closely related to the proposal. nsf authorization to deviate from these instructions must be received prior to proposal submission. the amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented and justified in the budget justification as specified below. the cover letter should include all necessary elements for full informed consent, but is not signed. documents so that each page is the same way up. authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable). you are applying for a programme in a different field from that of your principal/major degree subject, you may wish to supply additional material supporting your application; for example if you hold a degree in engineering and are applying for msc human rights on the basis of your current employment, a supplementary professional reference would be helpful. nsf will not accept or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. only the list of ten will be used in the review of the proposal. note that voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. this checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. the following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by:Non-lead organization. these reports should reference the work of the collaborative, while focusing on the distinct work conducted at each funded organization. additional information on the charging of indirect costs to an nsf award is available in aag chapter v. and suspension: the aor is required to complete a certification regarding debarment and suspension. resulting awards will be administered in accordance with standard nsf policies and procedures, including no-cost extensions and supplemental funding requests. organizations are responsible for identifying nsf-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered dual use research of concern as defined in the us government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern and for compliance with the requirements established in that policy. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). only acceptable irb approval documents are those that approve a human subjects research protocol; approvals "in concept" are not acceptable. each participant may, but is not required to, check the nonprocurement list. you can find general patterns or trends, but should never assume that what you have found is what exists or what will always exist. [insert the full name of the principal investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by nsf, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the project description or the facilities, equipment or other resources section of the proposal. centers focus on integrative learning and discovery and demonstrate leadership in broadening participation through focused investments in a diverse set of partner organizations and individuals. is defined as tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the proposer for financial statement purposes, or ,000. same general principles apply to other types of non-academic organizations. iacuc approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate "pending" in the space provided for the approval date. documents so that each page is the same way up. this will allow the group some time to adjust to your presence (and hence, for you to get more accurate observations). all types of research require permission—for example, if you are interested in analyzing something that is available publicly (such as in the case of commercials, public message boards, etc) you do not necessarily need the permission of the authors. pay attention to what is being said during the interview and follow up responses that sound interesting. for example, proposals for the operations and maintenance of research vessels may list the project/performance site as the vessels home port. for a listing of drc’s visit our drc listing page. faqs regarding fastlane proposal preparation and submission also are available in the fastlane..Proposers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of nsfs mission, as articulated in investing in science, engineering, and education for the nations future: nsf strategic plan, 2014-2018. in all other cases, this certification shall obligate the proposer for the period during which the federal financial assistance is extended to it by the foundation. the certification for contracts, grants, loans and cooperative agreements is included in full text on the fastlane submission screen as well as in gpg exhibit ii-5. a proposal that includes reference citation(s) that do not specify a url is not considered to be in violation of nsf proposal preparation guidelines and the proposal will still be reviewed. list of: (i) up to five products most closely related to the proposed project; and (ii) up to five other significant products, whether or not related to the proposed project. a statement of the need for such a gathering and a list of topics;. remember that it is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete, including all references, the transcript and the fee, and where applicable gre/gmat scores and research proposal. single proposal method allows investigators from two or more organizations who have developed an integrated research project to submit a single, focused proposal. no prior approval from nsf is necessary as long as that change would not cause the objectives or scope of the project to change.

IRB Application Process Guide - Office of Research Support and

if a risk to confidentiality remains despite all research being concluded (i. your cv/resume, including your employment history or other professional experience, including internships. for data management and sharing of the products of research, including preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples, physical collections, curriculum materials and other related research and education products should be described in the special information and supplementary documentation section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. if the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter "worldwide" on the cover sheet. they focus on investigations at the frontiers of knowledge not normally attainable through individual investigations, at the interfaces of disciplines and/or by incorporating fresh approaches to the core of disciplines. a closed question is one with a set of possible responses or yes/no responses. you should also scan the reverse of your transcript if the mark scheme is explained there.. general, serious, continuing) and nature of the non-compliance, how investigators deviated from approved protocol, or failed to follow irb procedure. in situations where a postdoctoral researcher is listed in section a of the nsf budget, and is functioning in a senior personnel capacity (i.., rapid, eager, ideas lab, equipment, conference, and international travel) to check for compliance prior to submission to nsf. list of up to five examples that demonstrate the broader impact of the individuals professional and scholarly activities that focuses on the integration and transfer of knowledge as well as its creation. this will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under the eager mechanism; this suitability must be assessed early in the process. renewed funding of an ideas lab award may be requested only through submission of a full proposal that will be subject to external merit review. here is an example:Observation: the teacher walks around the circle and speaks to each student individually." this means for subjects to be anonymous the researcher must not be able to identify them. for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the federal government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. the decision whether or not to use the suggestions, however, remains with the program officer. examples of persons included in this category are doctoral associates not reported under b1, professional technicians, physicians, veterinarians, system experts, computer programmers and design engineers. many interviews, however, are not done under the condition of anonymity. "call for participants" solicitation that describes the specific focus of the ideas lab will be issued. submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed:29. research projects require access to computational, data storage or visualization resources in order to complete the work proposed. an example of an open-ended question is: how are you feeling today? to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements in the non-english version will be true and accurate, and have the same meanings as the statements in the english version. proposals to any nsf program require operational worksheets by the first wednesday of june in the year before any proposed fieldwork. such information should be clearly identified as "other personnel" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. if more than one, the first one listed will serve as the contact pi, with whom all communications between nsf program officials and the project relating to the scientific, technical, and budgetary aspects of the project should take place. investigators may be working in closely related areas or their research may be multidisciplinary. components in new proposals or in requests for supplements, such as facilitation awards for scientists and engineers with disabilities (fased), research opportunity awards (roas), research experiences for undergraduates (reus), or facilitating research at primarily undergraduate institutions (ruis and roas). all collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements, and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the project description.., as part of the registration fee), the per diem or subsistence allowance should be correspondingly reduced. special purpose or scientific use computers or associated hardware and software, however, may be requested as items of equipment when necessary to accomplish the project objectives and not otherwise reasonably available. for example, if you are studying the parking issue on campus and look at the amount of cars being parked on campus vs. gpg chapter v for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals.(2) if any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit standard form lll, disclosure of lobbying activities, in accordance with its instructions. under rare circumstances, program officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision..The required proposal certifications are as follows:Certification for authorized organizational representative (aor) or individual proposer: the aor is required to complete certifications regarding the accuracy and completeness of statements contained in the proposal, as well as to certify that the organization (or individual) agrees to accept the obligation to comply with award terms and conditions. anonymous real-time peer review involving the participants and the ideas lab panel is incorporated into the workshop format, providing iterative constructive feedback during the development of project ideas. prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "certification regarding debarment, suspension, ineligibility and voluntary exclusion - lower tier covered transaction", provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions. where applicable, the box for "historic places" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet. collaborative proposals may be submitted to nsf in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award. this material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. you choose to observe is another important consideration that can affect the quality and results of your observations. therefore, the project description (including results from prior nsf support, which is limited to five pages) may not exceed 15 pages. a description of such support should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. a good way to do this is to ask someone else to read your questions or even test your survey out on a few people and see if the responses fit what you are looking for. nsf will combine the proposal submission for printing or electronic viewing. who graduated from their most recent study before january 2014 may supply one non-academic reference in place of one of your academic references. this statement must include all of the information requested on the proposal budget for each person involved., equipment and other resources: if there will be support from other sources for the conference, such information should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. you are observing a group that is not found in public (such as a group of card players, a sports team, or a special-interest group), it may be wise to plan to spend multiple sittings with the group. according to the irs, us territories and possessions are as follows: puerto rico, us virgin islands, guam, american samoa, the commonwealth of the northern mariana islands, midway island, wake island, palmyra island, howland island, johnston island, baker island, kingman reef, jarvis island, and other us islands, cays, and reefs that are not part of any of the fifty states. direct charging of these costs may be appropriate only if all the conditions identified below are met:(i) administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity;. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. small type size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small type not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for nsf to return the proposal without review. addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert nsf officials to unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under e. for consistency with the nsf cost sharing policy, if person months will be requested for senior personnel, a corresponding salary amount must be entered on the budget. this supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to nsf policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results (see aag chapter vi. section of the proposal is used to assess the adequacy of the resources available to perform the effort proposed to satisfy both the intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

ASA Committee on Funded Research Posts Document on Top

programmes administered jointly by lse and other institutions may have specific requirements; please consult individual programme entries. proposers interested in learning more about current or future nsf centers are encouraged to contact the appropriate disciplinary nsf program officer. following provides a listing of the types of costs that are not allowable for inclusion on a conference budget. it is not nsf's intent, however, to place an undue burden on proposers to search for the url of every referenced publication. this proposal pin and the temporary proposal id generated by fastlane when the non-lead proposal is created must be provided to the lead organization before the lead organization submits its proposal to nsf.), the rehabilitation act of 1973 (29 usc 794), the age discrimination act of 1975 (42 usc 6101 et seq. accordance with nsf policy, by signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the requisite certification of compliance with national science foundation nondiscrimination regulations and policies. the letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. for submission of proprietary or privileged information are provided in gpg chapter i. in instances involving special equipment for persons with disabilities, the need for such may be unique to the individual. proposals must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled "data management plan". be considered for admission, all applicants must supply the documents a to f below, and g to k where applicable. funds may be requested for field work, attendance at meetings and conferences, and other travel associated with the proposed work, including subsistence. specific guidance on the need for additional documentation may be obtained from the organizations sponsored projects office or in the references cited below.(1) taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the rehabilitation act of 1973, as amended; or. the cognizant nsf program officer will make decisions regarding what constitutes appropriate support on a case-by-case basis. any request to support such items must be clearly disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and be included in the nsf award budget. proposers are advised that the mentoring plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page project description limitation.. which specifies federal agencies are required to use the negotiated f&a rate that is in effect at the time of the initial award throughout the life of the sponsored agreement.: if you are writing about the activities of the purdue football team one of the best ways to learn about the team is to go talk to them and observe their behavior. principal risks are those associated with a breach of confidentiality concerning the subject's participation in the research. mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, organizations, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in stem disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. primary research is an excellent skill to learn as it can be useful in a variety of settings including business, personal, and academic. you are working on a topic that is relatively new or original and few publications exist on the subject. if your documents are not in english, we must receive a translation carried out by an accredited translator (eg, the british council)., which is part of the national center for atmospheric research, is a significant resource, 1. budget and budget justification: an annual budget and budget justification for the operation, maintenance and administration of the proposed equipment, (gpg chapter ii. you must have fully graduated by the time you register at lse. known at the time of proposal submission, the intent to enter into such arrangements must be disclosed in the proposal. the information contained in this guide will assist the organization in preparing documents which nsf requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of the organization. proposers should address what they want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. do not send supporting documents directly to the academic department as this will delay your application. pis who wish to exceed the established page limitations for the project description must request and receive a deviation in advance of proposal submission. for-profit entities are subject to the cost principles contained in the federal acquisition regulation, part 31. the requisite information is described in the nsf prospective new awardee guide. it is important to remember that both exempt and expedited studies are reviewed "in house. for each proposal that describes an international activity, pis should list the primary countries involved on the cover sheet.   initially, rsc may send the investigator(s) in question a notice requesting the suspension of all research activities while the issue of non-compliance is reviewed, consistent with federal mandate 45 crf part 46. please make sure that each page of your research proposal bears your name in a header or footer. (this question is both very wordy and leads the participant. anticipated services must be justified and information furnished on each individuals expertise, primary organizational affiliation, normal daily compensation rate, and number of days of expected service. proposals will be reviewed internally by the cognizant nsf program officers, the ideas lab panelists, and other external reviewers, as appropriate. additional information on the allowability of consultant or professional service costs is available in 2 cfr 200. information on how to contact us is given on our getting in touch page." proposers are advised to select "no closing date" when the proposal is not submitted in response to any relevant nsf funding opportunity (which includes program descriptions, announcements, or solicitations). the role of the ideas lab panel is to provide an assessment of the project ideas developed there. with disabilities eligible for facilitation awards include pis, other senior personnel, and graduate and undergraduate students. amount of compensation should be clearly set forth in the informed consent/authorization document. to proposals for conferences, symposia, or workshops, if any section is not required, insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, "not applicable. certification set out below is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the agency determined to award the grant.: analysis involves collecting data and organizing it in some fashion based on criteria you develop. if no such rate exists, the nsf awardee may either negotiate a rate or will fund the subrecipient using the de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. registered office address of the school is: the london school of economics and political science, houghton street, london wc2a 2ae, uk; tel: +44 (0)20 7405 7686. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. travel proposals may request support only for the international travel costs of the proposed activity. national science board issued a report entitled investing in the future: nsf cost sharing policies for a robust federal research enterprise(nsb 09-20, august 3, 2009), which contained eight recommendations for nsf regarding cost sharing. detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in fastlane. regarding unpaid federal tax liability: if the proposer is a corporation, the aor (or equivalent) is required to complete a certification that the corporation has no unpaid federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.., federal, state, local or foreign government agencies, public or private foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations, or internal funds allocated toward specific projects) must be listed.

Search for FDA Guidance Documents > Institutional Review Boards

guidelines outlined below are meant to assist investigators in determining a reasonable amount of compensation that can be given to research participants and also place some boundaries on what is and is not “reasonable. for research assets or projects that are geographically distributed, the proposer should report information for the primary site, as defined by the proposer. this mechanism was developed collaboratively within nsf, modeled on the "sandpit" workshops that are a key component of the united kingdom research councils "ideas factory" program. however, if no such rate exists, the nsf awardee will fund the foreign subrecipient using the de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. minority business must be: (i) at least 51 percent owned by one or more minority or disadvantaged individuals or, in the case of a publicly owned business, have at least 51 percent of the voting stock owned by one or more minority or disadvantaged individuals; and (ii) one whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more such individuals. for example, although video games and violent behaviors are shown to have a link, it has not been proven that video games cause violent behavior (instead, it could be that individuals who are predisposed toward violent activity are drawn to violent video games). the solicitation will specify the content and submission instructions for such applications. the approval letter must affirm that an animal-use protocol covering the proposed activities has been approved, and should explicitly list the proposers name, the title and number of the nsf proposal, and the date of iacuc approval. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. will be asked to comment on the quality of the prior work described in this section of the proposal. traditionally, the drc has approved the study by physically signing the application, however, the drc is now able to electronically approve studies. provides support for a variety of individual centers and centers programs that contribute to the foundation's vision as outlined in the nsf strategic plan. to provide the level of cost sharing required by the nsf solicitation and reflected in the nsf award budget may result in termination of the nsf award, disallowance of award costs and/or refund of award funds to nsf by the awardee. the proposal is:A collaborative proposal from one organization (see gpg chapter ii. if there are no collaborators or co-editors to report, this should be so indicated.[ ] proposal budget:[ ] each budget line item is documented and justified in the budget justification. interviews: phone interviews can be used when you need to interview someone who is geographically far away, who is too busy to meet with you to talk, or who does not want to use internet technology. the biological sciences directorate exception to this policy is delineated in gpg chapter i. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. the proposal must include relevant information, including countries to be visited (also enter names of countries on the proposal budget), dates of visit, if known. this section should provide a discussion of the broader impacts of the proposed activities. each proposal26 that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers27 must include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. regarding lobbying: when the proposal exceeds 0,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding lobbying restrictions. example, if you wanted to write on the connection between the purdue university glee club performance locations and estimated attendance of events, you would have to determine this yourself through primary research methods. nsf, grantee notification should be made to the cost analysis & audit resolution branch, division of institution & award support, nsf, arlington, va 22230.(b) publication/documentation/dissemination (line g2 on the proposal budget). they may contain biased terminology or are worded in a biased way. the organization will follow recommendations specified in the guide for details involving laboratory animals, and taxon-specific guidelines approved by the american society of ichthyologists and herpetologists, the american society of mammalogists, and the ornithological council, as is appropriate for the taxon to be studied. (including address information) regarding the pi is derived from login information and is not entered when preparing the cover sheet. this work may be considered especially "high risk-high payoff" in the sense that it, for example, involves radically different approaches, applies new expertise, or engages novel disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspectives. whenever possible design human subjects research to be anonymous as this poses the minimal risk to research subjects. a double-entry notebook has two columns, one for what is directly observed and one is for what the observer interprets from the events. rapid funding mechanism is used for proposals having a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to, data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events. organization where the reviewer is an officer, director, trustee, or partner,Has a financial interest in the outcome of the proposal. is important that all proposals conform to the instructions provided in the gpg or nsf grants. if the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter "worldwide".(2) for other nsf grants when more than ,000 has been budgeted in the proposal for repair, alteration or improvement (construction) of a building or facility. all other elements of a "full proposal" are waived (i. the certification for contracts, grants, loans and cooperative agreements also is included in full text on the fastlane submission screen. ask you to provide the documents as requested (or as close to them as you can manage) so that we can make a good decision on your application. for proposals that contain a subaward(s), each subaward must include a separate budget justification of no more than three pages. of compliance with national science foundation nondiscrimination regulations and policies. most frequent delays to applications are caused by applicants not uploading the correct documents.) do you believe that the parking situation on campus is problematic or difficult because of the lack of spaces and the walking distances or do you believe that the parking situation on campus is ok? note that the application assessment fee is not refundable if you change your mind once your application has been acknowledged. "operate" in this context means being actively involved in the day-to-day management. regarding responsible conduct of research (rcr)13: the aor is required to complete a certification that the institution has a plan to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research to undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by nsf to conduct research. the specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the project description to permit evaluation of the request by knowledgeable reviewers. research is any type of research that you go out and collect yourself. the london school of economics and political science is a school of the university of london. a list of the names of the individuals own graduate advisor(s) and principal postdoctoral sponsor(s), and their current organizational affiliations, if known.. projects requiring high-performance computing resources, large amounts of data storage, or advanced visualization resources. analysis can be done on new documents or performed on raw data that you yourself have collected.. for fellowship proposals submitted by individuals that involve use of vertebrate animals, a copy of the approval letter from the iacuc (including assurance number and organizational signature) should be included in the supplementary documentation section of the proposal or sent directly to the cognizant nsf program officer. salaries of professional personnel, editorial and clerical assistants and other staff members in proportion to the time or effort devoted to the preparation and conduct of the conference and summarizing its results.., responsible for the scientific or technical direction of the project), a mentoring plan is not required. decide what group you are going to focus on surveying based on who you have access to and what your research is focused on. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. if external review is to be obtained, then the pi will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process.

Writing a Research Project Proposal (generic template)

if a continuing review is not received by the study expiration date, the study is suspended. this normally occurs through national academies studies, workshop reports, professional society activities, and other community-based mechanisms, including engineering studies and research projects related to the development of new technologies.. other professional -- a person who may or may not hold a doctoral degree or its equivalent, who is considered a professional and is not reported as a principal investigator, faculty associate, postdoctoral scholar or student. pis are cautioned that the project description must be self-contained and that urls must not be used because: 1) the information could circumvent page limitations; 2) the reviewers are under no obligation to view the sites; and 3) the sites could be altered or deleted between the time of submission and the time of review..2) (note: this box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the biological sciences directorate. question: what is your opinion of the parking situation on campus? a university, professional society or other non-profit organization may apply for funds to enable it to coordinate and support us participation in one or more international scientific meeting(s) abroad.(ix) total direct and indirect costs (f&a) (line j on the proposal budget). organizational support will be made available, as described in the proposal, in order to address the broader impacts and intellectual merit activities to be undertaken. this support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation.[ ] special information and supplementary documentation:[ ] the types of information identified in gpg chapter ii. little information has been published about the topic other than a few editorials and letters to the editor in the local paper. guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements; however, pis are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. the keys when analyzing your data is to pull out information that is the most pertinent to your writing, information you can highlight and discuss, and information that will support your claims (if you are making any).[ ] if the proposal has been previously declined and is being resubmitted, the proposal has been revised to take into account the major comments from the prior nsf review. signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative hereby certifies that the organization will comply with title vi of the civil rights act of 1964 (42 usc 2000d), title ix of the education amendments of 1972 (20 usc 1681 et seq. the answer to this question depends on what information you are attempting to discover and how much you want to find out. the drc is responsible for reviewing studies within their respective departments.. postdoctoral (scholar, fellow, or other postdoctoral position) -- an individual who has received a doctoral degree (or equivalent) and is engaged in a temporary and defined period of mentored advanced training to enhance the professional skills and research independence needed to pursue his or her chosen career path. the ideas lab concept incorporates a "guided creativity" process, thus the use of a facilitator(s) is included, both to guide the creation of interdisciplinary teams and the creative development of ideas, and to ensure that the workshop progresses in a productive manner. the project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified. contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. fastlane uses the rules specified for each type of proposal, (e. we will not accept additional references unless the selectors request them during the decision-making process. the recommendations of the ideas lab panel are advisory to nsf.[ ] the proposed work is appropriate for funding by nsf, and is not a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by nsf from the same submitter. these interviews allow you to talk to people at great distances and give you the benefit of adapting your questioning based on the responses you receive.(c) consultant services (also referred to as professional service costs) (line g3 on the proposal budget). all collaborative proposals arranged as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via fastlane.'t overload your application with extra documents - the selectors won't have time to read them and we really don't need them. regarding organizational support: the aor is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by section 526 of the america competes reauthorization act of 2010. once your file is with the selectors we will not add new documents to it until it returns to us. when notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. you should supply this information for all university level study and any transfer programmes or exchanges that you have undertaken. undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:(1) no federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. organization where the reviewer is employed, has an arrangement for future employment or is negotiating for employment; or. you will not be able to finally submit your application until we receive the outstanding documentation. funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate participation in nsf-supported projects by persons with disabilities may be provided under existing nsf grants. you can conduct primary research in the form of surveying individuals in the surrounding community and local decision makers to gain more information. a list of all persons (including their organizational affiliations, if known), with whom the individual has had an association as thesis advisor. the institution code is 0972 for the gre and hmt 86-56 for the gmat. observing, it is especially important to separate observations from your feelings or reactions to observations. they also include the history of non-compliance for the pi, co-pi, and/or faculty sponsors, how the event was reported to the irb, what steps if any the investigator took to rectify the non-compliance, and finally the implications for participants and the informed consent process. cognizant program officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. irb may waive the requirements for obtaining informed consent/authorization or approve a consent/authorization procedure which does not include, or which alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent/authorization listed above, provided that all of the following four conditions are met:The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects;. specification of a desired start date for the project is important and helpful to nsf staff; however, requests for specific start dates may not be met. submitted collaborative proposals and proposals that include subawards are a single unified project and should include only one supplemental combined data management plan, regardless of the number of non-lead collaborative proposals or subawards included. biographical sketch (limited to two pages) is required for each individual identified as senior personnel. do not take interview responses out of context and do not discuss small parts of observations without putting them into the appropriate context. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal. please check the current processing date before contacting us regarding your documents. to the use of wild birds in research; guidelines of the american society of mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research; guidelines for the use of fishes in research; and guidelines for the use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research. unless stipulated in a specific program solicitation, however, such proposals will be subject to the 15-page project description limitation established in section (ii) above. a computing device is considered a supply if the acquisition cost is less than the lesser of the capitalization level established by the proposer or ,000, regardless of the length of its useful life. faculty sponsor is typically your dissertation or thesis chair, however, this is not always the case. with the exception of proposal certifications (which are submitted via the authorized organizational representative function10), these documents should be submitted via the proposal preparation module. proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. topics of discussion in chat rooms for patterns based on gender and age. the english version into the spoken language (non-english version) of the research participants.

Reference Documents - Research Participant Portal

(d) a listing of the publications resulting from the nsf award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the references cited section of the proposal); if none, state "no publications were produced under this award. in such cases, the item for senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by that amount omitted.[ ] single copy documents:[ ] authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable). "rapid" proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in fastlane. section of the proposal calls for required information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals, including this project, and any subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants. these project ideas typically will be high-risk/high-impact, as they represent new and unproven ideas, approaches and/or technologies. such letters should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of the fastlane proposal preparation module and follow the format instructions specified in gpg chapter ii. is very difficult to be able to study all the factors that relate to a specific group of people, an event, or an occurrence. letters of support submitted in response to a program solicitation requirement must be unique to the specific proposal submitted and cannot be altered without the authors explicit prior approval. can i make sure my biases are not reflected in my research methods? should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). project description is limited to two pages and should include information regarding the applicants specific expertise and interest in the topic area, as well as about certain personal attributes that enhance the success of the ideas lab workshop mechanism (e. if irb approval cannot be obtained at the time of the award action because the development of a human subjects research protocol requires preliminary or other conceptual work to take place, the pi should notify the cognizant nsf program officer assigned to the proposal. also include those individuals who are currently or have been co-editors of a journal, compendium, or conference proceedings during the 24 months preceding the submission of the proposal. grantee certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:(a) publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantees workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;. this date, at minimum, should cover the period at which the project is initiated. for example, school district letters are typically signed by the superintendent for schools in that district. some governments require nonresidents to obtain official approval to carry out investigations within their borders and coastal waters under their jurisdiction. possible, please send all supporting documents in a single package. proposals to nsf will be reviewed using the two nsb-approved merit review criteria described in greater length in gpg chapter iii. take active steps to scrutinise and verify documents received during the application process. pis wishing to continue research beyond their one-year approval time period must submit a continuing review. while there is no established page limitation for the references, this section must include bibliographic citations only and must not be used to provide parenthetical information outside of the 15-page project description. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. for instructions on how a faculty sponsor approves an application visit our approval instructions page. of the benefits of combining primary research with secondary research is in the area of data triangulation. are several examples of analysis:Recording commercials on three major television networks and analyzing race and gender within the commercials to discover some conclusion. if requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable. if we discover this is not the case, your application may be cancelled.(3) has not, more than 90 days prior to this certification, been notified of any unpaid federal tax assessment for which the liability remains unsatisfied, unless the assessment is the subject of an installment agreement or offer in compromise that has been approved by the internal revenue service and is not in default, or the assessment is the subject of a non-frivolous administrative or judicial proceeding. some programmes have specific requirements which are different to this; please check the relevant programme page for information. this generally includes the following types of activities: reports, reprints, page charges or other journal costs (except costs for prior or early publication); necessary illustrations; cleanup, documentation, storage and indexing of data and databases; development, documentation and debugging of software; and storage, preservation, documentation, indexing, etc. the application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in fastlane. failure to include these headings will result in the proposal being returned without review. assistance available: español | 繁體中文 | tiếng việt | 한국어 | tagalog | русский | العربية | kreyòl ayisyen | français | polski | português | italiano | deutsch | 日本語 | فارسی | english. this guide also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements associated with federal awards. the historical trends in public laws by looking at the records at a local courthouse. it is assumed that the consent/authorization form is only part of the total consent/authorization process in which the investigator, perhaps using the written consent/authorization form as an outline, describes all facets of the study and answers the subject's questions. conformance is required and will be strictly enforced unless an authorization to deviate from standard proposal preparation requirements has been approved. collaborative proposal is one in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. when a study is approved an approval letter is sent to the pi by email. this certification is binding on the proposer, its successors, transferees, and assignees. under rare circumstances, program officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. those interested should visit the blue waters portal (https://bluewaters. nsf is not responsible or in any way liable for the release of such material. question: do you agree or disagree that campus parking is a problem? in addition, a list of all persons with whom the individual has had an association within the last five years as a postgraduate-scholar sponsor. proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed so long as the item and amount are considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable under 2 cfr 200, subpart e, nsf policy, and/or the program solicitation. shared support by several federal agencies, states or private organizations is encouraged. in fact, it is hard to make concrete generalizations about any occurrence that relates to people because people themselves are dynamic and situations are always changing. requests for funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for the project and documented in the budget justification. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. if included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. conducted upon private-premises other than the university of texas at austin requires approval of that site. institution at which the reviewer is currently enrolled as a student, or at which he/she serves as a visiting committee member; or. your sponsor will provide valuable recommendations about experimental designs aimed at reducing the risk to human subjects. such proposals would be designated as an "ideas lab renewal.. this initial notice will also include a statement detailing the rationale for the irb’s action.

) and documented in a letter of collaboration from each collaborator. unacceptable products are unpublished documents not yet submitted for publication, invited lectures, and additional lists of products. it is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared..Certification regarding nondiscrimination: the aor is required to complete a certification regarding compliance with nsf nondiscrimination regulations and policies. this most likely occurs with surveys that individuals complete but occasionally can occur during interviews or even with observations. sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to nsf. for large facilities construction, the major research equipment and facilities construction (mrefc) account is one option.), nor is an assurance on file with ohrp (http://ohrp. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. invited full proposals (which are prepared in accordance with standard research proposal formatting guidelines) must be submitted within two months of receiving nsf notification after the ideas lab. nsf is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. programmes may have specific requirements regarding the research proposal; please check before you apply. a good way to do this is to take your observations in a double-entry notebook. (this is confusing because the question isn't clear about what it is asking--parking in general?[ ] biographical sketch(es):[ ] the content described is in accordance with the instructions, and does not contain additional information beyond that specified. conference proposal must contain the elements identified below:Project summary (gpg chapter ii. reviewed during a non-compliance inquiry include: the category of original review (e. such information must be provided in this section, in lieu of other parts of the proposal (e. "control" in this context means exercising the power to make policy decisions. funds may be included for furnishing a reasonable amount of hot beverages or soft drinks to conference participants and attendees during periodic coffee breaks. is no separate program for funding of special equipment or assistance. pending: the transcript or mark sheet must include a list of subjects studied and the grades obtained to date., whose time will be charged directly to the project, only the total number of persons and total amount of salaries requested per year in each category is required. these resources are not auditable by nsf and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. however, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of a request after issuance of an nsf award to add a subaward or contract will document the organizational determination required. information is used to help identify potential conflicts or bias in the selection of reviewers. the proposal is a renewal proposal, or an accomplishment-based renewal proposal, the applicable box must be checked.(a) the grantee certifies that, as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant. awardees remain subject to the provisions of omb m-01-06, "clarification of omb a-21 treatment of voluntary uncommitted cost sharing and tuition remission costs," regarding requirements for committing and tracking "some level" of faculty (or senior researcher) effort as part of the organized research base. the project summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, and a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity. of the strategic objectives in support of nsfs mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at nsf awardee organizations. proposing organization that is new to nsf or has not had an active nsf assistance award within the previous five years should be prepared to submit basic organization and management information and certifications, when requested, to the applicable award-making division within the office of budget, finance & award management (bfa). encourage persons with disabilities to pursue careers in science and engineering by stimulating the development and demonstration of special equipment that facilitates their work performance. the requested start date should allow at least six months for nsf review, processing and decision. given as a “bonus” or incentive for completing the study is acceptable to the fda, providing that the amount is not coercive. information necessary for the review of a proposal must be contained in sections a through i of the proposal. you enter the uk on a student visa and we later withdraw your offer/registration due to the discovery of fraudulent documents, you should be aware that the uk home office may deport you, and also may ban you from the uk for up to ten years. requests for funds for equipment or assistance that compensate in a general way for the disabling condition are not permitted. for example, funds may be requested to provide: prosthetic devices to manipulate a particular apparatus; equipment to convert sound to visual signals, or vice versa, for a particular experiment; access to a special site or to a mode of transportation (except as defined below); a reader or interpreter with special technical competence related to the project; or other special-purpose equipment or assistance needed to conduct a particular project./phd applications that are received without a research proposal that addresses these questions will not be considered. requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation business rules that must be followed. the following questions when beginning to think about conducting primary research:What do i want to discover? provides characteristics of each type of arrangement to assist proposing organizations in making that determination. concurrent submission of a proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review by nsf. cost of computer services, including computer-based retrieval of scientific, technical and educational information, may be requested only where it is institutional policy to charge such costs as direct charges. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. information submitted in the following areas is not considered part of the 15-page project description limitation. in such cases, the following instructions apply:(i) during the preliminary proposal stage, the proposing organization should identify the submission as a preliminary proposal by checking the block entitled, "preliminary proposal" on the proposal cover sheet;. however, a continuing review can be submitted during this time. proposed duration for which support is requested should be consistent with the nature and complexity of the proposed activity. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. the proposal preparation checklist (gpg exhibit ii-1) may be used to assist in this review.(b) list of up to five publications most closely related to the proposed acquisition. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. regarding dual use research of concern: the aor is required to complete a certification that the organization will be or is in compliance with all aspects of the united states government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern. to our recommended word limit - the selectors don't have time to read huge documents running to many pages. pi(s) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic prior to submission of an eager proposal. many of these mechanisms are funded by interested nsf programs on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals. the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the federal agency(ies) must be identified in the spaces provided.

a general policy, nsf limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. your faculty sponsor is your primary contact for human subject concerns and questions. proposals normally compete with proposals for research or education projects. for the definition and allowability of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget. must include an outline research proposal with your application – see above and refer to your programme page. to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the proposal preparation guidelines established in the gpg or the nsf grants. if certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to nsf. proposals for conferences should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. proof read before you upload it, and the final correct version is uploaded.., federal, state, local or foreign government agencies, public or private foundations, industrial or other commercial organizations, or internal funds allocated toward specific projects) must be listed. it is a charity and is incorporated in england as a company limited by guarantee under the companies acts (reg no. budget category refers to direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with nsf-sponsored conferences or training projects. order for nsf, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. your proposal should be approximately 1,500 words in length (outline proposals for mres programmes can be shorter). are notified electronically of nsfs decision regarding whether they are invited or not invited to participate in the ideas lab. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a reviewer cannot review a proposal if:The reviewer, the reviewers spouse, minor child, or business partner;. the investigator is responsible for insuring that research subjects understand the research procedures and risks. this will ensure that you fulfil our requirements and that your application is processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. individual's name and either nsf id or primary registered e-mail address, must be entered in the boxes provided. observations provide you insight about specific people, events, or locales and are useful when you want to learn more about an event without the biased viewpoint of an interview. it must include clear statements as to why the proposed research is of an urgent nature and why a rapid award would be the most appropriate mechanism for supporting the proposed work. prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. group travel grantees are required to retain supporting documentation that funds were spent in accordance with the original intent of the proposal.. in addition to other provisions required by the proposing organization, all contracts made under the nsf award must contain the applicable provisions identified in 2 cfr 200 appendix ii. these issues apply to both the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. where meals or lodgings are furnished without charge or at a nominal cost (e. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. data triangulation is when a piece of data, a finding, or a generalization is able to be verified with several different research methods. this certification sets forth the nondiscrimination obligations with which all grantees must comply. such personal information is not appropriate for the biographical sketch and is not relevant to the merits of the proposal..Travel outside the areas specified above is considered foreign travel. nsfs revised cost sharing policy statement for the foundations overarching policies on cost sharing. temporary dependent care costs above and beyond regular dependent care that directly result from travel to conferences are allowable costs provided that the conditions established in 2 cfr 200. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; eager proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg.], the proposer may be requested to submit supplemental post-proposal submission information to nsf in order that a reasonable and accurate assessment of environmental impacts by nsf may be made. requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation. this means that your research has to be approved by an ethics review committee to make sure you are not violating any of the above considerations. types of research, such as surveys or observations, should be conducted under the assumption that you will keep your findings anonymous. the substance of the relationship is more important than the form of the agreement. proposers are advised not to exceed the mandatory cost sharing level or amount specified in the solicitation. information below applies to the vast majority of applicants, however some exceptions exist for certain circumstances.. graduate record examination (gre) general test and graduate management admissions test (gmat)., the institutional setting in which the consent/authorization is sought will pose the possibility of coercion. and provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives; and. because proceedings of such conferences normally should be published in professional journals, requests for support may include publication costs. part of its effort to promote full utilization of highly qualified scientists, mathematicians, and engineers, and to develop scientific and technical talent, the foundation has the following goals:To reduce or remove barriers to participation in research and training by persons with physical disabilities by providing special equipment and assistance under awards made by nsf; and.., experience and interest in working in teams, communication skills, level of creativity, willingness to take risks). you will need recording equipment for the interview, and it is highly recommended that you bring two recording devices with you in case one fails. substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. non-english version must then be translated back into english to ensure that all statements are accurate and reflect the statements made in the english version. must follow instructions for selection of an applicable nsf division/office and program(s) to which the proposal should be directed.(iii) all components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date and time30, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review.(viii) indirect costs (also known as facilities and administrative costs (f&a) for colleges and universities) (line i on the proposal budget). the other side to this is that by not participating in an event, you may not gain a complete understanding of that event. double-barreled question is a one that has more than one question embedded within it. proposers are advised that the data management plan must not be used to circumvent the 15-page project description limitation. this is a very short form that summarizes your research project; the pi and (if one exists) faculty sponsor sign the closure report. is imperative that all proposals conform to the proposal preparation and submission instructions specified in the grant proposal guide. if the proposal is not submitted in response to a specific program description, announcement, or solicitation, proposers should select "grant proposal guide.

Research proposal is a non bias document

information on the awardee organization is pre-filled on the cover sheet based on the login information entered. conformance with all preparation and submission instructions is required and will be strictly enforced unless a deviation has been approved in advance of proposal submission. consent/authorization must be documented by the use of a written consent/authorization form reviewed and approved by the irb and signed by the subject or subject's legally authorized representative.(f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed work. nsf does not infer any distinction in scientific stature among multiple pis, whether referred to as pi or co-pi. similar information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently to other possible sponsors, including nsf. will assist reviewers and foundation staff in dealing effectively with proposals. some people are not fluent at typing, however, so you may not get as lengthy responses from this option. of mentoring activities include, but are not limited to: career counseling; training in preparation of grant proposals, publications and presentations; guidance on ways to improve teaching and mentoring skills; guidance on how to effectively collaborate with researchers from diverse backgrounds and disciplinary areas; and training in responsible professional practices. for your first survey, however, it is better to keep things simple. any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistance extended to the proposer by the foundation, this certification shall obligate the proposer, or in the case of any transfer of such property, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. instructions submission of the sf lll are available in fastlane. names of the pi(s), faculty, and other senior personnel and the estimated number of full-time-equivalent person-months for which nsf funding is requested, and the total amount of salaries requested per year, must be listed.-free workplace: the aor is required to complete a certification regarding the drug-free workplace act. if not originally written in english, you should translate the essay yourself.[ ] list of suggested reviewers, or reviewers not to include has been provided (if applicable). question: there are many people who believe that campus parking is a problem.(c) a summary of the results of the completed work, including accomplishments, supported by the award. can also use primary research to confirm or dispute national results with local trends. equipment to be purchased, modified or constructed must be described in sufficient detail to allow comparison of its capabilities with the needs of the proposed activities;. eager funding mechanism may be used to support exploratory work in its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches.[ ] references cited:[ ] this section includes bibliographic citations only and does not provide parenthetical information outside of the 15-page project description. for those projects that require such resources at a scale that is beyond that typically available locally, nsf supports a number of resources. the checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines.(e) notifying the agency in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. entering the proposal preparation module, the pi will be prompted to select information describing the nature and type of proposal being developed. it is expected, however, that the cost (including equipment adaptation and installation) will not be a major component of the total proposed budget for the project. proposal must contain a summary of the proposed project not more than one page in length.(3) the undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. conducting research at institutions that provide services to subjects may be perceived as implying that continued service is dependent upon participation in the research. in addition, research is illuminating existing practices surrounding ethical issues, and providing an evaluation of pedagogical innovations in ethics education. irb may waive the requirements for obtaining informed consent/authorization or approve a consent/authorization procedure which does not include, or which alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent/authorization listed above, provided that either of the following two sets of conditions are met:The research presents no more than minimal risk and. the role of the selection panel is to provide advice on the selection of participants. the proposal also may identify up to four additional co-pis. you are unable to use the online system, a pdf of the application form is available on request. it is one of the most powerful supercomputers in the world. that end, in accordance with the above-referenced nondiscrimination statutes, and nsfs implementing regulations and policies, no person in the united states shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the proposer receives federal financial assistance from the foundation; and hereby certifies that it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. please note that if you do not fall into one of the listed categories, the department will not consider your application without the required test score. ultimately, what type of question you ask depends on what you want to discover.. a listing of recent meetings on the same subject, including dates and locations;. pi will be required to respond to the following statement in the irbaccess application: i certify that i will/have review(ed) the translation from the english version to the non-english version. a justification based on the established computer service rates at the proposing organization must be included. for these proposals, the project title must begin with the words "collaborative research: if funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award..When mandatory cost sharing is included on line m, and accepted by the foundation, the commitment of funds becomes legally binding and is subject to audit. this effort must be documented in accordance with 2 cfr 200, subpart e.. projects involving research with human subjects must ensure that subjects are protected from research risks in conformance with the relevant federal policy known as the common rule (federal policy for the protection of human subjects, 45 cfr 690). note, however, that if awarded, a single award would be made to the submitting organization, with any collaborators listed as subawards. information about the scores we accept is in the entry requirements section. if the project is to be funded through an award to a foreign organization or through an individual fellowship award that will support activities at a foreign organization, nsf will require a statement explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the award to confirm that the activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws in the foreign country and that the international guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals (see http://www. the results must be separately described under two distinct headings, intellectual merit and broader impacts;.[ ] results from prior nsf support have been provided for pis and co-pis who have received nsf support within the last five years. participant support costs must be specified, itemized and justified in the budget justification section of the proposal. personnel categories listed on parts a and b of the proposal budget are defined as follows:1. equipment proposal must contain all of the following proposal sections:Project summary: gpg chapter ii. once you have written your proposal and developed the supplemental materials, the next step is to get irb approval. the specific nature, purpose, and need for equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the proposal to permit evaluation by knowledgeable reviewers. gpg exhibit ii-2 contains information on conflicts of interest that may be useful in preparation of this list. sections of the proposal differ based on the organizations role. is a great way to discover what a large amount of people think about a particular issue or how a group of people report their behavior.

includes that which is relevant to your programme choice(s). compensation for time normally spent on research within the term of appointment is deemed to be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary. for obtaining authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions are provided in gpg chapter ii. if it is later determined that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the federal government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. irb research proposal is a description of your study plan and must be submitted in the required format (see template at the link below). project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. the proposer recognizes and agrees that such federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made in this certification, and that the united states shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this certification. you should also be aware that all documents are non-returnable. it is the proposing organization's responsibility to assure that only properly authorized individuals perform this function. information on nsfs rcr policy is available in the aag chapter iv. question: don't you agree that campus parking is a problem? note that we will acknowledge documents which are posted/emailed to us when they are processed rather than when they are received. however, proposers are advised that they are still responsible for ensuring that biographical sketches created using third-party solutions are compliant with nsf proposal preparation requirements. that your scanned document is legible before you upload it. certification is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all federal grants, cooperative agreements, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the proposer by the foundation, including installment payments after such date on account of applications for federal financial assistance which were approved before such date.[ ] the proposal is responsive to and compliant with the provisions in the program description, announcement, or solicitation. the irb is responsible for determining if the incentive amount is not so large as to be coercive or represent undue influence. you must pay using the website (credit or debit card) in order to submit your documents and application online. the personnel categories listed below, the proposal also may include information on exceptional qualifications that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.. while training plans are not required to be included in proposals submitted to nsf, institutions are advised that they are subject to review upon request. it is useful when looking at actions, events, or occurrences in different texts, media, or publications. equipment proposals, the following must be provided for each auxiliary user:(a) short biographical sketch; and. the key to being a good observer is to pay attention to the details of a situation, write as much as you can, and write it as detailed as possible. for example, many professional societies as well as governmental licensing authorities for professional scientists and engineers have adopted policies or best practices that might be usefully considered. this includes items such as: home address; home telephone, fax, or cell phone numbers; home e-mail address; drivers license numbers; marital status; personal hobbies; and the like. standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies);. nsf will not accept34 or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. exempt studies, posing minimal risk to human subjects, take approximately 2-3 weeks to process from the date received by rsc. in addition, several professional associations and groups have stated that this practice is unethical. such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem); improved stem education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive stem workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the us; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education. this description must be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as in a full research proposal, and must emphasize the intrinsic merit of the activity and the importance of the equipment to it./messaging interviews: it is also possible to interview someone via an instant messaging service such as msn messenger, icq, or aol instant messenger. faculty sponsor is required for all students conducting human subjects research.(1) the prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from a covered transaction by any federal department or agency; (b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal, state or local) terminated for cause or default. detailed instructions for the preparation and submission of collaborative proposals are available in fastlane. sure that your questions directly relate to what it is you are studying. make sure that all scanned documents are legible, and attached in a commonly used format such as jpeg, pdf or word document.. a statement of how the meeting will be organized and conducted, how the results of the meeting will be disseminated and how the meeting will contribute to the enhancement and improvement of scientific, engineering and/or educational activities;. signing the nsf cover sheet and submitting this proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the certifications set out below. not send non-documentary materials such as dvds, cds or large publications, as we do not have the facilities to include these with your application file and they will be discarded. certification is required for an award of a federal contract, grant or cooperative agreement exceeding 0,000 and for an award of a federal loan or a commitment providing for the united states to insure or guarantee a loan exceeding 0,000. the aor must use the "authorized organizational representative function" in fastlane to sign and submit the proposal, including the proposal certifications." as such, the information is not provided to reviewers for use in the review of the proposal. of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through letters of collaboration. it is important to remember to choose a faculty sponsor which works well with you. personnel category for which nsf funds are requested must indicate, in the parentheses provided on the proposal budget, the number of persons expected to receive some support from those funds. as specified below, special information and supplementary documentation must be included as part of the project description (or part of the budget justification), if it is relevant to determining the quality of the proposed work. you have already taken an english test at the time you apply, you should include your most recent test scores and score report form number in the relevant section of the application form. additional information on the allowability of consultant or professional service costs is available in 2 cfr 200. if you find information that is highly questionable, it is best to not include it in your analysis of results. that your scanned document is legible before you upload it. product must include full citation information including (where applicable and practicable) names of all authors, date of publication or release, title, title of enclosing work such as journal or book, volume, issue, pages, website and url or other persistent identifier. this is a secure and confidential service for referees and helps speed up the decision-making process.. the following information regarding the organizations intention to utilize vertebrate animals as part of the project should be provided on the cover sheet:(i) the box for "vertebrate animals" must be checked on the cover sheet if use of vertebrate animals is envisioned. these approvals to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions may cover a particular program or programs or, in rare instances, an individual deviation for a particular proposal. subjects research that deviates from the policies, procedures, stipulations, or decisions of the irb is subject to further inquiry by the irb. if this option is exercised, senior personnel salaries and person-months must be itemized in a separate statement, and forwarded to nsf in accordance with the instructions specified in gpg chapter i. project description is expected to be brief and must be no more than five pages. facilitate proposal preparation, frequently asked questions (faqs) regarding proposal preparation and submission are available on the nsf website.

it is very useful when you want to gain expert opinions on the subject or talk to someone knowledgeable about a topic. if there is no irb approval provided, and the foreign country is not included in the department of health and human services, office of human research protections (ohrp), international compilation of human research standards (http://www. to submission, it is strongly recommended that an administrative review be conducted to ensure that proposals comply with the instructions, in the format specified. conflicts that cannot be satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated, and research that proceeds without the imposition of conditions or restrictions when a conflict of interest exists, must be disclosed to nsf via use of nsfs electronic systems. a type of analysis would be to record commercials on three major television networks and analyze gender roles.[ ] appropriate box(es) have been checked, and requisite information has been provided. failure to submit the required sections will result in the proposal not being accepted14, or being returned without review.(2) notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace, no later than five calendar days after such conviction;. you will be asked to set up a user account using your email address, and you should use this for all enquiries and applications (including if you are also applying for summer school or language centre courses).(2) where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall include an explanation with this proposal. iacuc approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate "pending" in the space provided for the approval date. primary research is a useful skill to acquire as it can greatly supplement your research in secondary sources, such as journals, magazines, or books. general purpose equipment such as office equipment and furnishings, and information technology equipment and systems are typically not eligible for direct cost support.(vi) other direct costs (lines g1 through g6 on the proposal budget). nsf program solicitations require submission of both a preliminary and full proposal as part of the proposal process. it is in your interests to supply academic references wherever possible. you recorded the interview with a tape or digital recorder, you may want to listen to it and type a transcript of the interview. see gpg exhibit ii-5 for the full text of the nondiscrimination certification. is a type of primary research that involves finding and interpreting patterns in data, classifying those patterns, and generalizing the results. description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject;. examples include aircraft rental, space rental at research establishments away from the grantee organization, minor building alterations, payments to human subjects, and service charges. longer surveys sometimes involve the same question asked in multiple ways to see if people are consistent in their answering strategies. it is important to note that the acquisition cost of equipment includes modifications, attachments, and accessories necessary to make the property usable for the purpose for which it will be purchased. regarding flood hazard insurance: two sections of the national flood insurance act of 1968 (42 usc 4012a and 4106) bar federal agencies from giving financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes in any area identified by the federal emergency management agency (fema) as having special flood hazards unless the:(1) community in which that area is located participates in the national flood insurance program; and. valid data management plan may include only the statement that no detailed plan is needed, as long as the statement is accompanied by a clear justification..Nsf encourages submission of proposals by groups of investigators; often these are submitted to carry out interdisciplinary projects. an overall acquisition plan which discusses arrangements for acquisition, maintenance and operation. is also nsfs expectation that nsf awardees will use the foreign subrecipients applicable us federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s). the school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i. submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, us code. under normal rebudgeting authority, as described in aag chapters ii and v, an awardee can internally approve an increase or decrease in person months devoted to the project after an award is made, even if doing so results in salary support for senior personnel exceeding the two month salary policy. signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. yellowstone operates its own allocations process and those interested in obtaining time and/or storage should consult the cognizant program director in the division of atmospheric and geospace sciences within the geosciences directorate. this section includes information on what primary research is, how to get started, ethics involved with primary research and different types of research you can do. if he or she does not want to talk about an issue, you should respect that desire.. by the written approval of the cognizant nsf assistant director/office head or designee. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a potential reviewer also may be barred from reviewing a proposal, if it involves individuals with whom he/she has a personal relationship, such as a close relative, current or former collaborator, or former thesis student/advisor. for some educational projects conducted at local school districts, however, the participants being trained are employees. list of suggested reviewers or reviewers not to include (optional). if this is not possible (for example where your referee is sending a reference to us directly) please ensure that all documents bear your full name as it appears on the application form and your date of birth or programme choice(s). the recommended format for letters of collaboration is as follows:"if the proposal submitted by dr. overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. note that registration fees under nsf-supported conferences are considered program income. the information on senior personnel salaries will be used as the basis for determining the salary amounts shown in the budget. such documentation may be required in final reports and is subject to audit. this helps add to your credibility and makes your findings stronger. within seven to fourteen days following the ideas lab, the nsf program officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. supports conferences in special areas of science and engineering that bring experts together to discuss recent research or education findings or to expose other researchers or students to new research and education techniques. certification in this clause is any material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. it is important to remember not to over-generalize your findings--in other words, don't assume that your findings are necessarily true of every person within the group or every person in a society. costs of translation services, audio visual, webcast, and computer services for recording, transmitting and transcribing the proceedings. a list of all persons in alphabetical order (including their current organizational affiliations) who are currently, or who have been collaborators or co-authors with the individual on a project, book, article, report, abstract or paper during the 48 months preceding the submission of the proposal. project description is expected to be brief and must be no more than eight pages. to our recommended word limit - the selectors don't have time to read long documents running to many pages. submission of proposals allows multiple organizations to submit a unified set of certain proposal sections, as well as information unique to each organization as specified below. if you wish to be considered without the test score, you should indicate which category of exempted applicant you fall into on the application form. you create a biased survey or ask biased questions, you’ll get biased results. the certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. sure that the documents you send are relevant to your application.

  • Resume field project controls planner
  • Spotty handed villainesses essay
  • Staphylococcus epidermidis research papers
  • Telling the time homework year 2
  • Thesis on ocular drug delivery
  • What does a fax cover letter look like
  • 3 challenges of writing a paper
  • Adam sandler research paper
  • Alexander essay and letter writing
  • Analyzing a formal magazine essay
  • Andromaque racine resume court
  • Believe christ christology essay in jesus we
  • Bespoke speech writing services
  • Best thesis theme plugins
  • Book report erika gomez schanne
  • Book report on dove song book
  • Business plan for starting up a coffee shop
  • Cover letter for a travel consultant
  • Cover letter for retail management
  • Crimal mind essay full auth3 filmbay yo12i aj html
  • Dissertation proposal for computer science
  • Dr jekyll and mr hyde book resume
  • Effective use of homework
  • English as the national language essay
  • Essay my best vacation
  • He wrote only a single essay
  • Hydroelectric energy research paper
  • Military dental service management resume
  • Nutrition in the elderly literature review
  • Packet core engineer resume
  • Proper reference page for resume
  • Quality assurance administrator resume
  • Research papers about college
  • (i) each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal pin. this also applies if we discover that your personal statement and any writing sample you submit is not your own work. the box for "proprietary or privileged information" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet when the proposal contains confidential budgetary information. if the proposal includes use of vertebrate animals, supplemental information is required. for this approval to be accepted by nsf, the organization must have a current public health service (phs) approved assurance. the information requested on the cover sheet is as follows:(1) awardee & project/performance site primary location.(ii) the lead organization must then enter each non-lead organization(s) proposal pin and temporary proposal id into the fastlane lead proposal by using the "link collaborative proposals" option found on the fastlane "form preparation" screen. analysis can usually be done without considering most of the ethical issues discussed in the overview, as you are not working with people but rather publicly accessible documents. the construction funding mechanism depends on the scale of the proposed facility. interviewing is a great way to learn detailed information from a single individual or small number of individuals. these answers can throw off your entire research project, so it is very important that you examine your surveys or interviews for this type of erroneous information.(x) amount of this request (line l on the proposal budget). nsfs mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in nsf programs, projects, and activities. a single investigator bears primary responsibility for the administration of the grant and discussions with nsf, and, at the discretion of the organizations involved, investigators from any of the participating organizations may be designated as co-pis. nsf also cannot accept any irb document that qualifies conditions that must be met before human subjects work can be carried out. postdoctoral scholars not identified under senior personnel above should be listed as other personnel. other relevant information, such as additional reading or research, work or other relevant experiences that have informed your decision to apply for the particular programme(s). visual materials, including charts, graphs, maps, photographs and other pictorial presentations are included in the 15-page limitation. currently or formerly registered at lse do not need to supply transcripts of their lse qualifications as these are generated internally. it is important to design your research protocol to account for risks to human subjects., equipment and other resources that includes a description of the physical facility, including floor plans or other appropriate information, where the equipment will be located; a narrative description of the source of funds available for operation and maintenance of the proposed equipment; a brief description of other support services available, and a statement of why the equipment is severable or non-severable from the physical facility (gpg chapter ii. graduate record examination (gre) general test and graduate management admissions test (gmat)h.. research facilities subject to the animal welfare act using or intending to use live animals in research and who receive federal funding are required to register the facility with the animal and plant health inspection service (aphis), us department of agriculture..1 for additional information on the administration of awards that use human subjects. letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an nsf proposal.: that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures required by the conflict of interest policy were made; and that conflicts of interest, if any, were, or prior to the organizations expenditure of any funds under the award, will be, satisfactorily managed, reduced or eliminated in accordance with the organizations conflict of interest policy. if any personal property is so provided, this certification shall obligate the proposer for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property., templates, and guidance documents are available at the irb forms page. their name(s) will remain on the cover sheet and the individual(s) role on the project should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. proposals are reviewed for both their scientific and computational needs. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a disqualifying conflict may exist, if a proposal involves an organization or other entity with which the potential reviewer has a connection. if it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the drug-free workplace act, the agency, in addition to any other remedies available to the federal government, may take action authorized under the drug-free workplace act. implementation of the ideas lab mechanism is a four-stage process as described below:A. type of proposal being developed:Research - other than rapid or eager (see gpg chapter ii);. note that the proposal may contain up to five pages to describe the results. budget and budget justification: a budget, and budget justification for the conference that is prepared in accordance with gpg chapter ii. similarly, ramps, elevators, or other structural modifications of research facilities are not eligible for direct support under this program. blue waters is designed to support a small number (~50) of research teams involved with projects requiring the most advanced computational and data resources. ideally related to your proposed topic of research or more broadly to the discipline/area for which you are applying. must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon when preparing any section of the proposal. for purposes of this guide, pi/co-pi is interchangeable with pd/co-pd. in order to qualify for support, however, attendance at meetings or conferences must be necessary to accomplish proposal objectives, or disseminate its results. the term "principal investigator" generally is used in research projects, while the term "project director" generally is used in centers, large facilities, and other projects. information should be clearly identified as "equipment proposal" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. requests are made in conjunction with regular competitive proposals, or as a supplemental funding request to an existing nsf award.(a) materials and supplies (including costs of computing devices) (line g1 on the proposal budget). the pi and any identified co-pis, however, will be jointly responsible for submission of the requisite project reports. research proposal should address the following questions:What is your general topic? is committed to preserving the benefits of life sciences research while minimizing the risk of misuse of the knowledge, information, products, or technologies provided by such research. do not send your original degree certificate, as documents cannot be returned..Foreign organizations that do not have a current us federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) are limited to a de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. the site letter must grant permission for the researcher to conduct research at that site.(iv) if funded, both lead and non-lead organizations are required to submit separate annual and final project reports. the data management plan will be reviewed as an integral part of the proposal, considered under intellectual merit or broader impacts or both, as appropriate for the scientific community of relevance. are some specific points to consider:You should have the permission of the people who you will be studying to conduct research involving them. funding of eager awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. this could be something as simple as being careful how you word sensitive or difficult questions during your interviews. nsfs contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the nations most creative scientists and engineers. broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to the project.

Sitemap