Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion not aimed specifically at science writers, but all ten lessons will apply to some degree. a methodology section in a research paper needs to achieve three things, though not necessarily in this order: firstly, it should consider what the nature of academic work is more generally, and what this might mean for anyone who explores the topic at hand. section is to objectively present your key results,Without interpretation, in an orderly and logical. first person: in the past, scientific journals encouraged their writers to avoid using the first person (“i” or “we”), because the researchers themselves weren’t personally important to the procedure in the experiment. thirdly, it should explain what methods this particular project uses and why. but such data should be reserved for the results section. then we can formulate a logical organizational strategy for the section. discussion: sometimes it is necessary to provide a preliminary discussion in your results section about your participant groups., david, & stoker, gerry (2010), theory and methods in political science (3rd ed. writers are often tempted to use the imperative (“add 5 g of the solid to the solution”) because that’s how their lab manuals are worded; less frequently, they use present tense (“5 g of the solid are added to the solution”). nothing your readers can dispute should appear in the results section.
What's in a methodology? - is especially important in the methods section of a lab report because readers must understand your experimental procedure completely. such projects usually have fully-fledged methodology chapters, often with sub-sections to discuss epistemological questions, the selection of research materials, and the exact steps taken to conduct the study. i am sure i can efficiently apply the methods of discourse analysis you’ve explained, but i can’t use the terminology that i see being used in the researches based on discourse analysis since i knew nothing about it. some writers and readers prefer different structures for the introduction. of the results section based upon the sequence of tables. there are loads of interesting articles in there (also on different media types, to answer the question you left in the other section), and those could be helpful. text of the results section should be crafted to follow this. job as a writer, then, is to fulfill these two goals. part of the discussion section is another place where you need to make sure that you’re not overreaching. also, don’t try to draw conclusions about the results—save them for the discussion section. of a main section heading:When your paper reports on more.