Writing a Literature Review | Libraryit was found that physical structures, such as standardized furniture, heating that could not be individually regulated, and no possession of a house key for residents limited their feelings of independence. literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed. literature review chapter from unpublished master's thesis, university of minnesota duluth, minnesota. as you take notes, record which specific aspects of the article you are reading are relevant to your topic (as you read you will come up with key descriptors that you can record in your notes that will help you organize your findings when you come to write up your review). you can begin anywhere, because you already know the order. galvan (2006:72) captures the difference between an annotated bibliography and a literature review very well: ". the mere fact of having a system can make the literature review seem much less daunting, so i recommend this system for anyone who feels overwhelmed by the prospect of writing a literature review. your topic teaches across disciplines, consider reviewing studies from each discipline separately. during this time, it will be important for the researcher to periodically review the research that has been going on at the same time as his or her own research. their system provides an excellent guide for getting through the massive amounts of literature for any purpose: in a dissertation, an m. the research should lead to more research questions and those questions will likely lead you to either revise your initial research question or go back and find more literature related to a more specific aspect of your research question. a literature review involves using research databases to identify materials that cover or are related in some sense to the research topic.
Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Reviewif the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, it should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and possibilities for future research. golash-bozaassociate professor of sociology, university of california, mercedwriting a literature review is often the most daunting part of writing an article, book, thesis, or dissertation. your role as a reviewer is to evaluate what you read, so that your review is not a mere description of different articles, but rather a critical analysis that makes sense of the collection of articles that you are reviewing. important: if you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite the page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review (as direct quotes must always be accompanied by page references). your review is long, provide an overview near the beginning of the review. addition to using the step-by-step guide that i have provided below, i also recommend that you (a) locate examples of literature reviews in your field of study and skim over these to get a feel for what a literature review is and how these are written (i have also provided links to a couple of examples at the end of these guidelines (b) read over other guides to writing literature reviews so that you see different perspectives and approaches: some examples are:Review of literature: university of wisconsin - madison the writing center. of tables that may be relevant to your review:Definitions of key terms and concepts. in the review, indicate why the topic being reviewed is important. some tips for identifying suitable literature and narrowing your search :Start with a general descriptor from the database thesaurus or one that you know is already a well defined descriptor based on past work that you have done in this field. it focuses on a specific topic of interest to you and includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work. a literature review is usually recursive, meaning that somewhere along the way, you'll find yourself repeating steps out-of-order. you complete these six steps, you will have a complete draft of your literature review.
one way to understand the differences between these two types is to read published literature reviews or the ﬁrst chapters of theses and dissertations in your own subject area. literature review – faculty participation in online distance education: barriers and motivators. owl (online writing lab): a user-friendly writing lab that parallels with the 5th edition apa manual. that the reference lists of recent articles and reviews can lead to valuable papers..write a literature review: university of california, santa cruz university library). abstracts of articles located in the initial search on mainstreaming will uncover related concepts such as inclusion and help a researcher develop a better, more effective vocabulary for fleshing out the literature review. there are two kinds of literature reviews you might write at university: one that students are asked to write as a stand-alone assignment in a course, often as part of their training in the research processes in their ﬁeld, and the other that is written as part of an introduction to, or preparation for, a longer work, usually a thesis or research report. if the review is an introduction to your own research, it highlights gaps and indicates how previous research leads to your own research project and chosen methodology. while a summary of the what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature. a paper in the sciences, or in some of the social sciences, the use of subheadings to organize the review is recommended. your topic if needed: as you search you will quickly find out if the topic that you are reviewing is too broad. it is best to use at least two databases relevant to your discipline.